I attended the school board’s most recent meeting at the Morgan Hill Unified School District office and do not agree that there was no community engagement. And I want to share what I experienced in attendance with my 16-year-old high school student from Live Oak.

No, lack of community engagement did not kill a bond measure; Trustees Altman, Munson and Gardiner did. And it’s clear that Morgan Hill newcomer Chris Robell helped them. As he kicked off public comment complaining about the superintendent, the board is breaking.

These four individuals do not have children who attend our schools, but the parents who spoke out at the board meeting do. 

I am a current Live Oak parent and am part of the School Site Council, and I asked the school board trustees at that last meeting to give us, the voters, the opportunity to decide on a bond in November.

As someone who works in tech and relies on data to make decisions, the data presented that evening was clear. And as a voter, I would have been able to read through the specifics of the bond proposal in my voter’s guide.

But despite this clear data, Trustees Nancy Altman, Rebecca Munson and Pamela Gardiner chose to play politics. What are they on the board for if they are not advocating for our kids? 

Voters should have had the opportunity to decide on a bond. But these three board trustees denied that opportunity and made it clear that evening that our students’ needs do not guide their decisions, but their own personal feelings toward Superintendent Dr. Carmen Garcia do.

Let’s be real, this is not about “community engagement,” because there was community engagement when the district developed its Facilities Master Plan. It’s clear that for these three trustees, it’s not about what’s best for kids; it’s personal. 

And for what? Who benefited from this vote? Not our students, not our teachers and not us parents. 

Trustees Altman, Munson and Gardiner, own your decision; take accountability. You put personal feelings over our kids. Period. 

Trustee Rebecca Munson, you denied me the opportunity to vote on a bond that would have had a direct impact on my child’s education, but you want my vote for County Supervisor? Make that make sense. 

Trustee Nancy Altman, you worked at the new Britton campus renovated with bond money, but denied the students and teachers of P.A. Walsh, San Martin Gwinn and Live Oak that same opportunity. Good for me but not for thee? 

Trustee Gardiner, why are you even on the board? We sat through 10 painful minutes of you complaining how links were broken, unable to clearly identify where and which links you were denied access. Distraction or lack of preparation.

You three and Chris Robell do not sit in the bleachers at our softball field; you do not have children who have to sit in desks that are 20 years old, or learn in 40-year-old portables, or drink from a water fountain that was installed in the 1960s. And yet, you made sure that our kids would continue to learn in these dilapidated facilities because your hatred of Dr. Garcia outweighs your commitment to our students and teachers.

I suppose my daughter was right when she told me right before my public comment, “Mommy, they don’t care about our classrooms.”

Angela Herrera

Morgan Hill

Previous articleReligion: When God takes you off the map

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here