Local groups up in arms over the suspension of an advisory
committee
Environmentalists are unhappy again with the people planning development in Coyote Valley.

The advocates, who have been protesting the loss of critical habitat and other ecological resources if San Jose were to turn its southwestern edge into a community of 25,000 homes 50,000 jobs and 50,000 residents, are criticizing planners for suspending an advisory committee of environmental interests.

Brian Schmidt, of the Committee for Green Foothills, said suspending the committee eliminates the advocates’ one real opportunity to provide input to the Coyote Valley Specific Plan Task Force.

“Environmental groups have been sidelined at the task force level,” Schmidt wrote in a letter of protest to the city. “Even at the [advisory committee] level, it is unclear to me whether we have had any influence, but at least we have a greater chance to make our arguments.”

Schmidt was joined in his protest by representatives of the Santa Clara Valley Audubon Society, the Greenbelt Alliance and the Sierra Club.

San Jose Planner Salifu Yakubu said the committee was suspended to avoid duplicating work in the planning process, and he offered to arrange an environmental focus group later this year.

“I need to emphasize,” Yakubu said, “that we continue to be committed to an open, public process with input opportunities for our many stakeholders.”

The Coyote Valley Task Force was convened in August 2002. Its 20 members represent San Jose, Santa Clara County, several homebuilders and planners and representatives of the city’s parks department and the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority.

The suspended technical advisory committee is made up of several environmental groups as well as experts on water, roads and transportation.

Committee member Melanie Richardson, a water supply expert with the water district, said the time is right for San Jose planners to put the committee on hold while they sort through the volumes of information they’ve collected in the last two years.

“The staff just needs to sit down and do some work and come up with a product for us to comment on,” Richardson said. “We continue to meet with them on specific issues regarding water supply.”

Coyote Valley is the largest remaining rural buffer between San Jose and South County. The plan has come under heavy criticism from environmentalists, officials from the Morgan Hill Unified School District – which includes Coyote – and landowners in the so-called greenbelt who think they are being denied fair market value for their property because San Jose refuses to allow development there.

Under the tenets of the city’s general plan, Coyote Valley development is not supposed to occur until at least 5,000 new jobs go to the area. Lately, Mayor Ron Gonzales has been leading an effort to reformulate the plan to immediately allow residential development.

Matt King covers Santa Clara County for The Times. Reach him at 847-7240 or mk***@gi************.com.

Previous articleAgriesti and Peralta Plead Not Guilty to Assault Charges
Next articleGolden Oak’s Ghostly Stories
A staff member wrote, edited or posted this article, which may include information provided by one or more third parties.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here