Gavilan Community College trustees have chosen a dicey time to
float the idea of asking voters to approve a bond measure.
Trustees, who voted last week to establish a committee to screen
candidates for a bond consultant, say that in light of recent
– and anticipated future – state budget cuts, the school can’t
afford to buy new land for expansion and to renovate the school’s
1960s-era campus.
Gavilan Community College trustees have chosen a dicey time to float the idea of asking voters to approve a bond measure.
Trustees, who voted last week to establish a committee to screen candidates for a bond consultant, say that in light of recent – and anticipated future – state budget cuts, the school can’t afford to buy new land for expansion and to renovate the school’s 1960s-era campus. The consultant, who would conduct opinion surveys to determine if a bond
would garner the needed 55 percent approval from voters, would charge an estimated $30,000 fee.
We’ll save the trustees some money and offer our opinion for free: Now is not the right time for a Gavilan Community College bond measure.
We think a bond measure will find a lukewarm reception at best in these tight economic times. Voters are frustrated by the state’s stewardship – or lack thereof – of once-plentiful tax funds by Sacramento, and are unlikely to approve giving more tax dollars to any government agency, even one as worthy as Gavilan College.
Steve Kinsella, the college’s new president, has only been on the job a few months, having succeeded Rose Marie Joyce, whose tenure was turbulent.
The Gilroy-based two-year college, which has successful branch campuses in Hollister and Morgan Hill, and its new president need to work on selling the institution to the community before asking taxpayers to open their wallets.
Gavilan needs to put the community back into Gavilan Community College. It needs to strengthen ties with area school districts and the community at large. It must do a much better job marketing the myriad services the collegeoffers to learners of all ages – from elementary to the elderly. It should work to convince taxpayers that Gavilan is an invaluable, indispensable part of South Valley before they’ll be willing to part with more of their sour-economy dollars.
We urge trustees to take it slow, and to reconsider spending money on a bond consultant right now. Instead, the school’s limited resources would be better spent creating and strengthening ties with the community. In a year or two, after Kinsella has established himself as an able administrator, and the community understands the important role the college plays in South Valley, then the school can begin to talk about asking taxpayers to approve a bond.
Trustees, please save your much-needed $30,000; we’ll tell you for free: Now is not the time for a Gavilan Community College bond measure.
