Dear Editor, Gayle M. Tiller from Planned Parenthood in San Jose
in a recent letter to the editor mentioned Roe v. Wade in
“Every woman should make own choices.” She called our present
administration “anti-choice.” I would prefer to call it
“pro-life.”
Dear Editor,
Gayle M. Tiller from Planned Parenthood in San Jose in a recent letter to the editor mentioned Roe v. Wade in “Every woman should make own choices.” She called our present administration “anti-choice.” I would prefer to call it “pro-life.”
It, as I, believe that God creates each human life with love and purpose. We, who cannot create the awesome miracle of innocent life, do not have the right to destroy it, but are to protect the helpless and vulnerable, whether in or out of the womb.
Why is a beautiful, miraculous new life welcomed as a baby if wanted but if unwanted called a, sucked out and thrown away on the altar of inconvenience?
Human rights are intended to protect others, not destroy them. Whatever happened to the rights of the unborn child? What about his or her choice to live?
Wanda Puder, Morgan Hill
