Question: Do you agree with the recent California Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage?
Chris Bryant: Yes. The decision was only a clarification of our constitutional basis of treating people equal without the creation of special classes.
David Cohen: Yes. Massachusetts legalized gay marriage and the world has not ended because of it. Like the repeal of other segregation and separation laws, it takes a few leaders before the rest follow, reluctantly or otherwise.
Dennis Kennedy: I don't feel I can thoughtfully answer this question in such a short time. I have to thoroughly review the sociological, ethical and theological issues involved.
Lisa Pampuch: Yes! The ruling correctly recognizes that the equal protection clause in California's constitution applies to everyone, gay or straight.
John Quick: Yes. Aside from the societal economic benefits that have been described, this decision acknowledges the emotional and health value of committed relationships for both individuals and the community.
Emily Shem-Tov: Yes! Any loving couple who is willing to take on the responsibility of getting married should have the right and honor of doing so, and I am proud to live in a state that recognizes that right.
Steve Staloch: Although I support civil unions, I believe in the traditional definition of marriage. However, I do believe partners in a civil union should be protected from employment and other forms of discrimination.
Maureen Webb: Yes. I think everyone is entitled to live their own life. If that's their choice and it will bring them peace and happiness, that's great.
Karen Anderson: I have mixed emotions. I don't want it to be a foot in the door for polygamy or any other combinations that people think of. n
Bert Berson: Yes. I agree with the decision. Anything else would violate the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Julian Mancias: Yes. Laws that ban same sex marriage are, by definition, discriminatory and a violation our California Constitution's "inalienable right to marry."
Although the Morgan Hill Times does not have any obligation to monitor this board, the Morgan Hill Times reserves the right at all times to check this board and to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to the Morgan Hill Times in our sole discretion and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. The Morgan Hill Times also reserves the right to permanently block any user who violates these terms and conditions. All threats to systems or site infrastructure shall be assumed genuine in nature and will be reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities. Submission of any comments will be considered permission to use online or in print.